Things change gradually and one day you suddenly realise
that something you have always thought or felt is no more. I used to look forward to the weekend
newspapers for the magazines. I also used to love reading other magazines and
even subscribed to a few.
As I flicked through this weekend’s crop I realised that
they are now so irrelevant to me that – apart from the occasional article - I
won’t miss them. Yay for the British fashion industry and I am sure that it
attracts much attention and many jobs but jackets in the thousands of pounds,
handbags similarly priced are completely irrelevant to me and, if the high
street is anything to go by, millions more.
I am vaguely interested in fashion, jewellery, furniture etc
and read the FT How to Spend it with
the same detached interest as I do the catalogue of the National Gallery. I
don’t expect to able to afford it, to own it or indeed to spend it – but enjoy
the view.
Some years ago, when working with (charity) cause-related
marketing, I learned something about how clothes are presented in
catalogues. Even though the catalogue is
aimed at those over 60 – the models are all in their thirties but with slightly
old-fashioned hairstyles. Apparently
that is “aspirational” we still think of ourselves as younger, perhaps wore
those hairstyles and have a misty-eyed view which will induce us to think that
we will look 35 in the Damart track suit (I am not knocking it – the cosiest and
warmest thing for working from home in winter).
Back to the Sunday magazines – they are now beyond
aspiration – they don’t send me out to the high street to see if I can
replicate it for less money; I can’t buy a new beauty product every week and
have abandoned keeping cuttings of interesting looking products in case I need
some gloop when my gloop runs out. In any event – beauty editors are not
exactly unbiased – it isn’t that they are paid
to promote products unless you count gifts in kind......
I hope this is wisdom kicking in.
No comments:
Post a Comment