Monday, 17 February 2014

The lucky baby-boomers and the unlucky unemployed

We had lunch with friends yesterday and the conversation touched on the baby boomers.  I remembered writing this blog last year but didn’t post it.  Perhaps I felt it was a rant and should probably rest for a while.  Having read it again – I think it is well-rested now, still a bit ranty, but here it is....

If anyone else tells me that the baby boomers were so lucky I will scream and scream until I am sick! I can tell you some of the things we didn’t have:

We didn’t take gap years – we went straight from school to further education or to work.  We got “jobs” – you went into work in the morning and came home at the end of the day and got paid. Sometimes you didn’t get paid very much, especially if you were being trained.  Sometimes the jobs were really, really boring – making tea, running errands and doing the drudge work that someone higher up the pecking order didn’t want to do - and sometimes there were no promotion prospects let alone a career path.

But you still plodded on. There was no safety net so if you wanted to eat, pay the rent, let alone get married and have children (ah so old-fashioned), you did what you needed to do, tried to get as much experience as possible so that when something better came along you could grab it. And sometimes you couldn’t take those opportunities.  I was a PA in a leading advertising agency, my boss told me that they had made a decision to hire their first female trainee account executive (Oh yes, those were the days) and suggested I apply for the job. I was very excited until I realized that it would mean halving my salary – and as my husband was studying that was out of the question – a missed opportunity but you did what you had to do.

Unemployed, unemployable?

There was an article in the Evening Standard last year about a school leaver who applied for 3,000 jobs over 15 months and failed to get a job. She had neither skills, nor qualifications nor could I find any kind of experience. Why should anyone look at her once, let alone twice?

This means that this young woman sent off on average 10 applications a day five days a week.  How targeted is that? I have had those sorts of applications, not only from school leavers but graduates and people with experience and they start “To whom it may concern....”, the name of the organisation was often wrong and sometimes they mentioned another organisation altogether.  Why should I, or anyone, read through to the end?  The internet is available – do the research.  If this is what young people are being encouraged to do they are being failed miserably.

By the time my Number One Daughter went to university she had done a number of things that would have interested me as an employer.  She and two school friends took on two paper rounds between them.  Two of the three did both rounds together and the third had a lie-in – each of them therefore had a lie-in every third day. (Ingenuity ✓ Commitment ✓ will turn up on time ✓); she had a Saturday job in a shop (reliable✓ customer service ✓).  While at university she worked at times as a domestic cleaner, washing up in a Mexican restaurant (never ate refried beans again) and sold books off a market stall.

She is now highly educated with a senior job – but all along the way the mindless jobs without a future have ticked a number of boxes that would have counted with or without a university education and speak volumes to a prospective employer.

She is not alone – many of my friends and former colleagues did seasonal work in factories, in shops, on building sites, in hospitals and on farms – those same jobs that are now being done by people coming here from other EU countries.  

Doing things that “look good on a CV” are not just for graduates.  An employer faced with a number of unskilled, unqualified applicants is desperate to find something that will indicate whether this person will stay the course, turn up on time, do a day’s work (and that means a day’s work not hours here and there in between texting and checking facebook) and pitch up again tomorrow and the next day.

My early involvement with people seeking work experience to complete their qualifications was interesting.  Our first candidate worked hard, never said no to anything and we offered him a trainee position when he qualified (fancy word for gofer.....) and is now Head of IT (and still sings a mean karaoke). The second had nails that were so long they curved around under her fingers.  It did not seem to impede her using her mobile phone which she did a lot but did hamper her typing and other tasks. We pointed this out to her but she said that she wasn’t prepared to cut them and we never saw her again.

As a post-script: I know that the current climate is different; the job market is difficult and that there are many talented and qualified young people who are unable to find work but sometimes you have to do the grunt work before you can follow your dream.

Saturday, 8 February 2014

Competition is part of life, but it isn’t always good

I am writing this while the Winter Olympics is on – taking part is good and if you have absolutely no chance of winning or even getting close, (the Jamaican bobsleigh team is an example) it is everything.  Otherwise winning is all-important.

My theme for today is actually around charities: charities are very competitive organisations and they fund competitive people.  In medical research, as much as all the research is being done for the greater good, there is competition but there is also huge collaboration.

Charities compete for funding – no one can support every charity and donors/supporters make decisions on which causes to support every day. There is nothing new about that but I have been very troubled by a series of advertisements that have been running this week. The strapline – next to a photograph says, “I wish I had breast cancer”.  The message in the smaller print is that pancreatic cancer has very poor rates of early diagnosis and the survival rates are poor as well.  Breast cancer has a high rate of detection with better survival rates.

There is a saying that there is no such thing as bad publicity and there is no doubt that the negative reaction to this advertisement from a number of breast cancer and other charities has given the charity much higher media coverage than they would have attracted otherwise. I am not sure how positive I would feel about this had I just been diagnosed with breast cancer.  I remember someone who had been treated for breast cancer saying to me – “they tell me I am lucky that it isn’t a very aggressive cancer, lucky would be not to have cancer!”

Once I got over my initial shock at what is quite a crass approach I was disappointed that it has come to this.  When I became involved with Breast Cancer Campaign in the early 1990s HIV/AIDS was top of the news agenda.  Breast cancer was still spoken about softly and not at all by many women. There were people who were keen that we were more vociferous about the amount of money spent on HIV/AIDS research and care compared to breast cancer, especially as they felt that HIV/AIDS was avoidable in the majority of cases and breast cancer wasn’t.

Whether that was true or not wasn’t the point – how could we be so arrogant to say that one disease is more worthy than another, that dying from breast cancer was some how more noble than succumbing to AIDS. You could even argue that screening for HIV was more important to the general community because others can be infected than screening for breast cancer. So we didn’t.

Breast cancer led the way for other cancers and other diseases with wonderful advocates who spoke out about their disease and campaigned for better diagnosis and treatment, greater awareness and a screening programme. All of which we have but it is still the second biggest cause of death from cancer in women.

I have lost friends and family members to pancreatic cancer – there are massive challenges, especially around diagnosis where, like ovarian cancer, the symptoms can be varied and time is wasted while they are attributed to something else. I am aware of the size of the challenge.

I would be interested to know the results of this advertising campaign – for a charity with last reported income of £172,000 was this a good use of resources, did it raise more money, were they flooded with requests for information and was it worth it?

Note:  while you are very welcome to comment on this blog and I will read your comment, I don’t publish them as I don’t wish to have to monitor it on a daily basis. You can always contact me through LinkedIn.

Wednesday, 22 January 2014

A jug of wine, a loaf of bread and thou......

I am not about to start home brewing but I decided to have a go at baking bread. I bake lots of bread but it is usually whole-wheat and the kind that is mixed and baked without kneading (or with a bread machine which gives a great result but is curiously unsatisfying).  I have tried various yeast-based things in the past – without success: the doughnuts looked more like gingernuts.

Having invested in “fast-action yeast” all the recipes seemed to use instant yeast (where you find fresh yeast in London goodness knows). However, I found this recipe online Handbaked traditional white bread and set to work.
The first thing to hit me was the smell. I was instantly transported back to the kitchen of my childhood where our cook (who came from what was then Portuguese East Africa and is now Maputo) used to make white bread, rolls and sometimes bagels several times a week. The recipe was the same and, although I never realised it, it was the recipe for challah – the only difference being that it was plaited in the traditional way for Friday night.

Who knows what the recipe was – he never used a written recipe but cooked by touch and taste. I did learn how to make the thinnest crepes by watching him and certainly licked the bowl when chocolate cake was being made but never thought of writing anything down, and how would you calculate the measures as he measured by handfuls.

What is also quite curious – I have never kneaded bread before but I seemed to know how – some sort of folk memory or just watching chefs on TV! Yes, it was very soothing and the smell of the fermenting yeast, the dough and the baking bread was déjà vu all over again!

I still think I prefer the whole-wheat kind and can only aspire to the giant challah my sister makes for her Friday night dinner but it was a satisfying day and the result was OK as well.



Monday, 20 January 2014

Culture on the cheap

Every time we go abroad I am shocked by how expensive it is to visit art galleries and museums. No wonder tourism to London is soaring – apparently a new record last summer with the number of foreign tourists up by 20 per cent. Official figures have shown that close to 5 million visitors came to London between July and September 2013 and they spent £3.372 billion which is up, even on the Olympic year.

Of course they will be visiting many tourist attractions for which they will pay but, for example, the National Gallery said that visitor numbers were “through the roof” up 17 per cent on the prior year. Unless you are attending one of the special exhibitions – it is FREE. The V&A is free; the British Museum is free -  and when I have visited very few people have put money in the boxes at the front. They are not free in Europe – but this is a rant for another day.

The purpose of this is to emphasise how you can enjoy the cultural delights of London for no or very little money.  On Friday I was walking past Somerset House and decided to visit the Isabella Blow - fashion galore exhibition. This is not one of the free ones but at £12.50 it seemed very reasonable. (The main collection that is housed there, the Courtauld Collection charges £6.00 - contrast this with one of my favourite small galleries in Basel Foundation Beyeler which charges 26.80 Swiss Francs (about £18.00) to visit the collection.) 

Back to Isabella Blow – you can read all about her in the link above – just to say it is a stunning show with films about her, and of her, and amazing couture clothes and hats from her own and other collections. Couture is about as relevant to me as sky-diving but when you see these clothes and hats up close you realise that the dividing line between this and art is very fine.  I came out uplifted.

Sunday we visited another favourite of mine, The Wallace Collection.  This is FREE and importantly it is not huge so you can while away a couple of hours and get an overview of most of it.  I can’t even begin to list some of the highlights as there are so many – paintings, porcelain, furniture, some amazing snuff boxes – and arms and amoury (the only part that is really not of interest to me).  They also have an exhibition of contemporary glass, which is quite quirky.  (They have substantially restored the building - have a look at the drapes and the cords holding them – these were commissioned from the same factory in France that made the originals and are stunning.) Having just visited the Isabella Blow exhibition it did occur to me that there are parallels between Reynolds or Watteau painting fine silk and satin and Julian Macdonald and Philip Treacy producing garments and hats from it. 

Today, Monday, was another bargain, and not far from the Wallace Collection, a lunchtime concert at the Wigmore Hall, a mere £10 and you could also have listened to it for free on BBC Radio 3!



Wednesday, 8 January 2014

Human Tissue Authority – emergency out of hours....

I have been sleeping with my mobile phone next to my bed the past two weeks – it also hasn’t left my side through all the holidays.  I wasn’t waiting for either good or bad personal news but was on the emergency out-of-hours rota for the Human Tissue Authority (HTA) where I am a non-executive member.  This is something that all non-executive members and senior staff do once or twice a year. Calls are very rare but when they do happen it could be a life or death situation.

You probably know that you can sign an organ donor card which means that if you die in circumstances where your organs can be used, they will be – opt in.  I did this several years ago.  In Wales the situation will change on December 1, 2015 when The Human Transplantation (Wales) Act becomes effective which will mean that you will need to opt out.

However, when it comes to donations of solid organs from living people, this is regulated by the HTA (see Organ Donations - frequently asked questions). The Human Tissue Act 2004, and associated regulations, requires the HTA to assess all proposed transplants from living donors and to decide whether the transplant should be approved, based on criteria set by Parliament. These are most often kidneys – you have two and can manage with one, or part of the liver – it can regenerate.

All donors and recipients are required to see a local Independent Assessor who is trained and accredited by the HTA. The Independent Assessor interviews the donor and recipient (both separately and together) and is independent of the healthcare teams who are involved with the transplant. The purpose of the interview is to ensure that no reward has been or will be given for the donation and the donor has given consent to the removal of their organ.

The donor must have the mental capacity to give consent and they must demonstrate an understanding of the medical procedure and the risks involved. We have to be satisfied that the donor has not been coerced into agreeing and is not under any duress. The Independent Assessor will then submit a report to the HTA; this report will be used to make a decision on the case.

Every week certain living donation cases are referred to a panel of non-executive members who assess the information and then make a decision on whether the transplant can go ahead, on the basis that the requirements of the Human Tissue Act 2004 have been met.

Very occasionally this will happen as an emergency out of hours, this might be when a person goes into sudden liver failure and has a potential living donor available. As the HTA is still responsible for ensuring that the requirements of the Human Tissue Act 2004 have been met, even in emergency cases, this responsibility is delegated to the individual on duty at the time.  We have all received training and have strict guidelines to follow. 

It is rare and unlikely but you can’t take chances so the processes are in place, just in case.

Note
It is a criminal offence to carry out a transplant operation between two living people if the conditions of the Human Tissue Act 2004 are not met. This means valid consent must have been given.

It is also an offence to buy or sell organs or human tissue. If convicted, the penalty for these offences can be a prison sentence of up to three years, a fine, or both.

Sunday, 5 January 2014

It’s not the rain that’s making me grumpy

There were a number of programmes on British TV a few years ago called Grumpy Old Men and Grumpy Old Women. All the contributors were in the public eye – actors, presenters, comedians etc and the programmes were hilarious.  All the things many of us think (even if neither grumpy nor old) said out loud.

Reading the news at the moment is making me very grumpy.  Article on the front page of The Sunday Times today with a cover photograph of a man rescued by the RNLI from a jetty in Cornwall while photographing the storm after being warned how dangerous it was.  Further, a father was holding his child over the sea wall when a wave swept him off his feet; fortunately he and the child were OK.  People have lost their lives and others rescued after ignoring warnings.

Why is it OK for these people to put others at risk and pressure on already strained services in a very difficult situation to indulge themselves?  I have watched amazing programmes about people who chase hurricanes and reporters knee deep in water reporting the storms. It's dangerous. Reporters die every year, three of the people who featured in a Discovery Channel programme on "storm chasers" died last year - and they were experienced. Are people so divorced from reality that seeing (apparently) survivable catastrophe and disaster on television has diluted the danger of what they are doing? 

Reading Guido Fawkes "UK Environment Agency massively overstaffed, arguably worlds most bloated quango" has led me to this blog by an insider at the Environmental Agency which is worrying to me as a tax payer (it is my money that is paying them) and should be very worrying to those affected by floods; if the agency is as overstaffed as indicated and there is widespread abuse of flexitime, money has been wasted.  Inside the Environment Agency






To comment or not to comment?

I don’t get many comments on my blog which is not surprising as I don’t publish them.  This is not because I am afraid of what people might say but rather because I wouldn’t want them to be published without my reading them and I would then have to decide which ones to publish or not and then justify it and it all becomes too much like hard work. If you leave a message I will see it and thank you to those who have.

I have a dilemma as someone – Emily – has left me a message and asked me to get in touch: I don’t have her email address so suggest if she or anyone else wants to get in touch with me - contact me through LinkedIn. It has a secure message system that avoids one having to give out a personal email address.

Perhaps I am missing a trick here but my blog is an occasional indulgence and I don’t want to turn it into hard work....