I am a bit paranoid about blogging or posting on Facebook or
Twitter while I am away. Apparently if you have a break-in, insurance companies
check social media to see if you are “advertising” that you are away from home
before they pay out. Told you I was
paranoid. We were in the USA late October and the following blogs are about our
visit.
Visiting
our close ally and friend is complicated. We don't need visas but have to apply
for an ESTA form online. There is a customs form to fill in on the plane; you
then stand in line to self scan your passport etc; receive a printed form and
then stand in line to go through the usual with an immigration officer. We were visiting family in New York and
Philadelphia but our visit to Washington DC was strictly “cultural”. When we responded to the immigration officer
that we were there on vacation, she asked what we were planning to do. To my
reply “visit art galleries and museums” her response was “Is that it?”. Well, yes but I threw in visiting family as
well. Surprisingly the luggage wasn't
through yet but, once collected, we then stood in line again to hand in our
customs form. (Our cases were opened and searched on the return journey – a form
inside indicated that this had been done.)
One assumes
that visiting the USA a month before the presidential election might generate
conversations about politics, theirs not ours. We were sure Clinton and Trump
would figure in conversations especially as Husband Number One insisted on
asking everyone their views.
We finally
worked out how to use Uber and it worked perfectly and was substantially less
than taxi fare. Yay! Just as well because conversations with Uber
drivers followed a theme that made Hillary’s “certain” victory look less
likely.
One is anecdote, two
is evidence...
This was once said – as a joke – in a scientific meeting I
attended. In a scientific context size
means a lot, which is why large scale clinical trials are required for new
drugs or treatments.
When it comes to market research, including opinion polls, we
rely on “representative” polls of relatively small samples, in relation to the
market or population size, to make our judgements. Although all sorts of
factors are built into these surveys, the opinion polls for the last UK general
election, the UK referendum and now the US Presidential election have proved
woefully inadequate.
Then there is “the man on the Clapham omnibus” – this
Victorian invention is still used in the courts when they need to decide
whether a party has acted as a reasonably educated and intelligent person
would.
Then there is the taxi-driver survey: when the only type of
taxi driver in London was the “black cab” driver and he (!) was usually a
Londoner, this was quoted as a guide to how Londoners thought.
Based on our cab/Uber driver survey in three cities, Trump
was a shoo-in. The conversations were not miles away from some of the Brexit
discussions (apart from those who had reasonably thought through reasons): – we
need a change, I’m tired of the establishment, I don’t think he/they will win anyway,
it’s a protest vote etc etc. Most had heard of Brexit, had no idea what it was
about but were aware the vote “had gone against the establishment”. I am not
sure that it was as clear-cut as that, but that was the impression.
To be contd.....